Get more information
Public sector procurement carries significant responsibility. It is tightly regulated and closely monitored. Procurement teams across central and local government, education, NHS organisations and emergency services must ensure every pound delivers clear value, strong compliance and meaningful public benefit.
Choosing the right procurement route is therefore essential. In the UK, organisations commonly use framework agreements and Dynamic Purchasing Systems (DPS).
In this blog, we explain the difference between these routes. We outline when each works best and show how structured procurement supports transparency, financial control and long-term sustainability.
Under the Procurement Act 2023, a procurement framework is an agreement between a public authority and one or more suppliers. It sets the terms for awarding future contracts, often known as call-offs.
In practice, frameworks work best when organisations have predictable and repeat requirements across departments. For example, public bodies often use them for:
Because contracting authorities complete a full competitive process at the outset, buyers can award call-off contracts later without repeating the entire tender process. As a result, the structure reduces complexity and improves efficiency, making procurement frameworks made simple for public sector teams managing complex requirements.
Public finances remain under sustained pressure. According to the Office for National Statistics, public sector net borrowing for the financial year ending March 2024 was provisionally £120.7 billion.² Although this figure is lower than the previous year, it still underlines the need for disciplined financial management across government bodies.
Against this backdrop, procurement decisions carry significant strategic weight. Every contract award must comply with regulatory requirements. At the same time, it must demonstrate clear value for money, transparency and long-term sustainability.
For this reason, structured procurement routes such as framework agreements and Dynamic Purchasing Systems (DPS) play a crucial role.
Framework agreements, in particular, support financial discipline in several ways. For example, they:
Similarly, a DPS can strengthen value by maintaining competitive pressure throughout its lifecycle. In addition, it enables new suppliers, including SMEs, to enter the market when they meet the required criteria.
In an environment where public spending is closely scrutinised, choosing the right procurement route is more than an operational task. Instead, it becomes a strategic tool for controlling risk, improving efficiency and protecting public value.
As a result, well-designed procurement frameworks allow teams to focus on long-term contract performance rather than repeatedly managing full tender processes.
Public finances remain under sustained pressure. The Office for National Statistics reports that public sector net borrowing for the financial year ending March 2024 reached £120.7 billion. This level of borrowing reinforces the need for disciplined financial management across government bodies.
In addition, total managed expenditure (TME) in 2023-24 reached £1,222.7 billion.³ This figure demonstrates the overall scale of UK public spending and shows the financial environment in which procurement teams operate.
A Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) works in a similar way to a framework. However, one key difference sets it apart. A DPS remains open, which means new suppliers can apply and join at any time, provided they meet the selection criteria.
As a result, a DPS works particularly well when:
In contrast to a framework, which appoints suppliers at the outset for a fixed period, a DPS keeps competition open throughout its lifecycle. Consequently, contracting authorities can respond more easily to changing market conditions.
When comparing frameworks and DPS, organisations must look beyond headline cost.
Frameworks often deliver savings and improve efficiency by consolidating demand across multiple buyers. For larger public bodies with repeated service needs, this approach creates consistency and strengthens purchasing power.
In contrast, a DPS can reduce costs through ongoing competition. This is particularly effective when specialist providers enter the market during the lifecycle of the system.
Ultimately, both routes can strengthen commercial outcomes when teams manage them well. Moreover, they support wider objectives such as resilience, supplier diversity and long-term social value.
Frameworks work best in scenarios where:
For example, public bodies often use frameworks for NHS estate services, school transport contracts and facilities management across property portfolios.
As a result, contracting authorities gain predictability and reduce administrative burden. In turn, this structure delivers greater consistency and stronger commercial control.
A Dynamic Purchasing System works best in situations where:
As a result, a DPS can maintain competitive tension throughout its lifetime. This flexibility proves particularly valuable for digital services, technical consultancy and emerging technologies.
However, organisations must manage a DPS carefully. They need clear processes to onboard new suppliers and maintain fair, ongoing competition.
Ultimately, the best procurement route depends on several key factors:
For this reason, organisations must assess their requirements carefully before selecting a route to market. When teams choose the right structure, they strengthen compliance, improve efficiency and deliver lasting value for public sector operations.
Deciding between frameworks and DPS does not need to be a binary choice. In many cases, organisations achieve stronger results when they use both routes strategically across different categories.
Frameworks deliver efficiency, consistency and regulatory confidence, particularly for repeat or high-volume spend. In contrast, DPS arrangements introduce flexibility and sustained competition where markets evolve quickly.
Therefore, procurement leaders should assess their priorities carefully and select the route that best supports their objectives. When teams align procurement structure with organisational goals, they strengthen compliance, improve performance and build long-term resilience.
With deep experience in public sector procurement, Inprova works alongside decision-makers to design and implement structured procurement routes that deliver measurable and sustainable value.
Sources:
